Logo-jrcm
J Anal Res Clin Med. 2013;1(1): 43-49.
doi: 10.5681/jarcm.2013.006
  Abstract View: 1129
  PDF Download: 616

Original Research

A comparative study of deficit pattern in theory of mind and emotion regulation methods in evaluating patients with bipolar disorder and normal individuals

Ali Fakhari 1, Khalegh Minashiri 2*, Abolfazl Fallahi 3, Mohammad Taher Panah 4

1 Associate Professor, Clinical Psychiatry Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Clinical Psychiatry Research Center, Department of Clinical Psychology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Clinical Psychiatry Research Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
4 Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: minashiri.kh@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared patterns of deficit in "theory of mind" and "emotion regulation" in patientswith bipolar disorder and normal individuals. METHODS: In this causal-comparative study, subjects were 20 patients with bipolar disorder and 20 normalindividuals. Patients were selected via convenience sampling method among hospitalized patients at Razi hospital ofTabriz, Iran. The data was collected through two scales: Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test and Emotion RegulationQuestionnaire. The data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. RESULTS: There were significant differences between patients with bipolar disorder and healthy individuals in theoryof mind and emotion suppression. Patient group achieved lower scores on theory of mind and higher scores onemotional suppression compared to the controls. But, in reassessment and total score of emotion regulation there wereno significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that both "theory of mind" and "emotion regulation" are impaired in patientswith bipolar disorder compared to healthy individuals and the patients are more liable to use suppression strategies. 
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1130

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 616

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 28 Jul 2013
Accepted: 26 Sep 2013
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)