Logo-jrcm
Submitted: 20 May 2024
Revision: 06 Aug 2024
Accepted: 22 Jan 2025
ePublished: 21 Oct 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Res Clin Med. 2025;13: 34916.
doi: 10.34172/jrcm.025.34916
  Abstract View: 201
  PDF Download: 194

Original Article

Comparative analysis of pulmonary functions, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in smoker and biomass smoke exposed COPD

Kumar Shanmugasundaram 1 ORCID logo, Anjana Talwar 1, Karan Madan 2 ORCID logo, Animesh Ray 3 ORCID logo, Geetanjali Bade 1* ORCID logo

1 Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
*Corresponding Author: Geetanjali Bade, Email: geetanjalibade@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Non-smoking chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the major contributors among total COPD cases in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to investigate pulmonary functions and estimate systemic and airway inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in serum and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) of cigarette-smoking COPD and biomass smoke-exposed COPD patients, comparing them with healthy smokers and healthy non-smokers.

Methods: A total of 45 participants were enrolled: smoker COPD (n=10), biomass smoke-exposed COPD (n=10), smoker control (n=10), and non-smoker control (n=15). Pulmonary function tests, including spirometry and impulse oscillometry, were performed. Inflammatory and oxidative stress marker levels in both serum and EBC were estimated.

Results: Spirometric parameters, including slow vital capacity (SVC), forced expiratory volume at 1st second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC were significantly less in COPD groups (smoker/biomass) as compared to controls. Smoker COPD had less FEV1/FVC than biomass-exposed COPD. COPD groups (smoker/biomass) exhibited significant impairment in lung mechanics, characterized by increased peripheral airway resistance (R5-R20), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), and resonant frequency (Fres), indicating involvement of peripheral airways. However, no significant change in lung mechanics exists between smokers’ COPD and biomass-exposed COPD. Among the oxidative stress markers, 8-isoprostane and nitrotyrosine-3 (NT3) levels in EBC were significantly higher in smoker-COPD compared to biomass-exposed COPD and non-smoker controls, respectively.

Conclusion: Significant pulmonary function impairment was observed in both smoker COPD and biomass smoke-exposed COPD. Inflammatory and oxidative stress markers are more deranged in smoker COPD than in biomass smoke-exposed COPD and healthy controls.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 202

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 194

Your browser does not support the canvas element.